For example, 2,570 (25%) active Churches did not pay percap in 2007 and they had a combined income of $270,431,754 (13%)!, Makes for a good headline, but is it accurate? Which of the following numbers is the most meaningful to you?
Description | # Churches | Income | Percap | Members |
Active Churches | 10,172 | $2,097,432,727 | $43,424,221 | 2,104,855 |
No Percap 2007 raw | 2,570 | $270,431,754 | 381,134 | |
No Percap 2007 NCD (non-reporting) | - 117 | $0 | 0 | |
No Percap 2004-2007 & (w&m&I>0) Non reporting? | - 530 | $146,815,885 | 131,965 | |
No Percap 2007 corrected | 1,923 | $123,615,869 | $5,137,864 (Avg 20.62) |
249,169 |
No Percap 2006 but some in 2007 & (w&m&I>0) | 619 | $140,542,085 | $3,338,842 | 120,494 |
No Percap 2006-2007 but some in 2004/2005 & (w&m&I>0) | 198 | $51,870,420 | $589,240 (2005) |
35,017 |
No Percap 2007 but some in 2004-2006 & (w&m&I>0) | 491 | $109,412,120 | $1,869,013 (2006) |
90,042 |
In trying to figure out how many churches failed to report for 2007, 765 Churches have m6=m7>0 and w=0 and i=0 and p=0 AND 64 Churches have m=0 and w=0 for the first time.
See my other page Statistics for 2007 for more lies, .... data!
No comments:
Post a Comment